Now mobile friendly
Site thumbnail

Hover mouse to enlarge

Watt and Stauch investigate what they consider to be an error in the courts: that of a failure to hold distinctive 'a breach of duty to invest prudently, from issues of causation and quantification of loss'. They use the case of Nestle v National Westminster bank [1994] 1 All ER 118 to illustrate their points. Conv. 1998, Sep/Oct, 352-361